The ramblings of an aspiring journalist.

Wednesday, 5 November 2014

Unimaginable Future

09:29 Posted by Joshua Gresham No comments
Taking a look at the influence of social media on journalism through the eyes of the journalists that have lived it.

By Joshua Gresham

It has been over a decade since Facebook was created and more than eight years since the inception of Twitter. Few would have anticipated just how quickly and on what scale these forms of social media would be imbedded into everyday life. Fewer still would have predicted to what extent these new forms of media, this digital media, would influence and change the scope of journalism. For better or for worse is yet to be seen. It is however abundantly clear that technology changes things, it has impact and influence, and in the case of journalism it has been no different.

The Editor (Eve Nesmith – Editor, The Maitland Mercury)









A 23-year veteran of news media named Eve Nesmith recalls the days when teams of people were required to create printing press plates out of molten melt. “Now one person can create an entire digital replica of a page single-handedly using a computer and a program,” she remembers.

Eve thought about a time now long gone, a time when wooden pigeonholes were checked for handwritten messages. When envelopes delivered the mail not the Internet. Much had changed over the course of her career, the emergence of social media has “smashed down the ivory tower” so she said. Not only was Eve, as a journalist, more accessible and accountable, but it had also created a two-way dialogue with the readers. It had provided readers, the audience as you will, with the means to communicate, share and express their opinions not only with each other on a global scale, but with those responsible for writing the stories. The journalists themselves were more accountable than ever before.

Whilst the modes of delivery have been altered with “Facebook, Twitter and Instagram all playing integral roles in content dissemination,” Eve believes the underlying foundations are the same.

“A story is still a story; contacts are still vital. The platform and voice may change but news sense and relevance remain constant.” Eve said.

Initially however, it was not the smoothest of transitions. The threat to newspapers and the livelihood of journalists such as Eve was evident. “I was briefly concerned at the proliferation of bloggers,” she remembers. Eve was and still is sound in the belief however, that the audience would continue to seek the accurate and quality information of professional journalists. The importance of making this more accessible was becoming clearer.

Although social media opens up the public to a wide range of views, it can also provide an extremely narrow experience for readers. Eve is most greatly concerned for humanity, in that the public will choose to only tune into those they agree with. “I fear it limits our humanity and empathy our education and awareness,” she says.

“Mistruths, assumptions and errors spread like wildfire around the globe when journos fail to check the accuracy and credibility of information,” she said. Whilst “Twitter is a great tool for journalism,” the dangers of it and other social media outlets are clear. However, Eve drills into the heads of each and every staff member the mantra of “no one-source reporting ever!” a foundation of good journalism and one that she believes must remain of key importance.

Despite the drawbacks, it dawned on Eve just how important the emergence of social media and digital media was to the future of journalism. A self-confessed Twitter addict, she believes the positive applications to be countless and its potential somewhat hard to grasp.

“Twitter comes into its own during a large-scale event, such as the fall of a government, or an act of war. So many voices and experiences in chorus on the same topic, but with varied perspectives,” she said.

Eve has brought with her a 20 per cent overall audience increase in her first year as Editor of the Maitland Mercury. Through developing a reverse publishing, online first, model at the paper Eve and her team are embracing the future of journalism and its every growing relationship with social media. She acknowledges its increasing importance leaving the thought that “we probably can't even imagine how it will next evolve.”

The Digitalist (Shoba Rao – Online Journalist, National News Desk)













Shoba Rao started and grew both the Facebook and Twitter accounts of The Daily Telegraph from scratch for 2 years, in her role as Social Media Editor. The pressure to push the publication forward was something she strongly felt. “With the growth of online news, social media had become a news gathering tool newsrooms couldn’t operate without,” she remembers. It has resulted in the newsroom being manned 24hours a day in an online sense.

Shoba has witnessed the dramatic change journalism has undergone during the last decade. Currently working as an online/digital journalist for the National News desk she is on the front lines of this continued evolution.

“Where and how news breaks and how it is covered,” said Shoba. That is the one of the most drastic and major influences that the relationship between social media and journalism has brought about.

Shoba was quick to embrace new media in its infancy and like the field she works in, it has shaped her career path as a digital journalist. She looked back to her work on the Rolf Harris and Oscar Pistorius trials and the role new media played.

“Some stories also emerge from the online space and it's great to be part of some of the biggest news stories of the day or night first ahead of anyone,” she remembers. Social media played an integral role in helping to produce live coverage of the events. “Without it, our ability to produce the news in such a way and provide the readers with adequate coverage would have been extremely difficult,” she recalled.

Shoba seeks to continue and further enhance the relationship between journalism and social media. Whilst working for the National News desk she has first hand experience of the role it plays in the current landscape. “Social media is crucial to journalism - it helps us find breaking news, we use it break our own exclusive stories, inform readers of changing news coverage by the second and it also allows us to engage in conversation and debate with readers about issues affecting them,” she commented. The ability to interact with the readers is ultimately enhanced by social media as it “creates a bridge between journalist and audience,” she said.

Like many others, Shoba’s core belief is that journalism needs to remain credible and fair before anything else. Without such foundations true journalism looses its quality and weight. “Regardless of daily pressures to be first with the story, journalism cannot sacrifice truth and integrity,” she said.

Moving into the future Shoba believes that the landscape must further embrace social media. Along with all its limitations and negatives it has an overwhelmingly positive influence. The enormity of this transition dawned on Shoba as she commented; “Journalism's survival depends on making a successful shift to digital media. It's a fast-paced environment where each day is different and stories change minute by minute, it's exciting to be a part of where the future of journalism is going”.

The Freelancer (Petra Starke – Freelance Journalist)















A career that ironically enough started in the same year that Facebook was born Petra in no way could have imagined the vast impact this social media juggernaut would have on the industry. For the past 10 years the Freelancer was not in fact a freelancer at all. She previously worked as Arts Editor for The Advertiser but left that position in November of last year. “Since then I have been working freelance, as a journalist writing for various publications around Australia,” she commented.

The last three years had brought about the biggest changes. “As newspaper sales and advertising revenues fell,” she remembered, many new publications began to launch online. Social media had brought about a change to the media landscape. It had altered “the way many journalists work - sourcing quotes, following leads, investigating, making contacts,” she said.

Petra quickly realised the growing influence and importance of social media and began using Twitter to enhance her “personal brand”. It dawned on her just how crucial new media could be and the potential it had to change the way journalism works.

“I think the biggest advantage, particularly with Twitter, is being able to directly engage with people - whether that's sources for stories, other journalists or your own readers,” she said. Twitter and Facebook play a big role in how news organisations interact with their readers. “Spreading information quickly and easily is a plus,” she added.

However, Petra is aware of the many pitfalls that come with social media and an over reliance on it and other new media. If something goes viral or has been spread on a massive scale “there's a temptation to just go with it to get in there and not miss out, rather than fact check it first - a big mistake for fair and accurate reporting,” she stated.

What lies next for journalism is something that Petra is unaware of but not phased by. Whilst its current benefits and influence are becoming clearer the future is anything but. The Freelancer believes “It's extremely important now, but how it continues to integrate with traditional media depends on how it evolves. Who knows what the social media channels of the future are going to look like and how they will operate? Who knows how much longer newspapers will be around in paper form? What will the next generation of media look like? All exciting stuff.”

Something to leave you on

The simple fact that Journalism is evolving was evident to each of the three media professionals. Whilst the negatives are there for all to see something they all agreed upon was the need for journalism to smoothly transition into the digital world. Even more so than what it currently is. Ultimately a major journalist goal and intention is to provide the audience with information founded in key journalistic principles. Social media enhances this ability and provides another avenue for this to occur. In order for prosperity to continue the general belief was that new media must further be embraced. Technology has brought with it a raft of changes and the landscape has shifted. As Eve said, “It’s a broad brush and a big challenge, but we are making strong strides”.

Thursday, 23 October 2014

Who goes there? Friend or foe...

12:07 Posted by Joshua Gresham No comments
As journalists become increasingly reliant on public relations practitioners the once large gap between the diverse and occasionally opposing professions appears to be fast reducing. The relationship between the two is a complicated one, with both sides vying for public attention. This often results in opposing angles that divide public opinion. However as the gap between each profession closes the differences become harder to pinpoint.

This very relationship is the topic of much discussion with the work conducted by PR practitioners a heavily used source for journalists. The relationship and transition of material between each side is ever growing. In fact a study by the Australian Centre for Independent Journalism and the independent news organisation Crikey.com found that nearly 55 per cent of stories were ‘driven by some form of public relations – media release, public relations professional.

However, research suggests that a large majority of journalists strongly deny using the work of PR practitioners and in fact dismiss it as ‘spin’. Jim Macnamara, University of Sydney Communication Professor, believes that “when practiced ethically, public relations is simply another source of information” and that the existence of such stereotypes denies this truth.

As traditional news media goes through a period of change, journalistic roles are in decline. Journalists are often resorting to editing and proofreading media releases, then churning them out as news stories, in order to meet deadlines and maintain reader retention. The number of journalist that actively go after and pursue the work of PR practitioners could steadily be on the rise.


Journalists have a responsibility to the public whilst PR practitioners have their client’s needs in mind. However both parties have a wider ethical and moral obligation to the public. It is because of this that the relationship, if utilised effectively, may flourish in the future. Ultimately, for PR practitioners, trust and a positive relationship with both the public and the journalists they work closely with is paramount. This ideal is of key importance if the relationship between each profession is to be mutually beneficial.

Wednesday, 22 October 2014

Is transparency the way of the future?

11:40 Posted by Joshua Gresham No comments
Walter Cronkite once said, “Objectivity is the reporting of reality, of facts, as nearly as they can be obtained, without the injection of prejudice and personal opinion”. For a very long time, objectivity was a corner stone, a foundation of journalistic practice however times appear to be changing. Along with the age of technology and the inevitable evolution of journalism, as we move towards the future, transparency has risen to the fore. It is now the widely held belief that transparency is the new objectivity.

Bob Franklin, The Future of Journalism, comments on this matter raising the point that “journalism… must be rooted in truth telling” and that journalists should be able to, with sincerity, say that they believe their version of events to be correct. However, the debate as to which should rein supreme rages on with Tom Kent, the standards editor for The Associated Press, rather bluntly putting forth that “to show their commitment to balance, journalists should keep their personal opinions to themselves”.


Wikileaks then came along and brought with it this new notion of radical transparency. Wikileaks, as seen on their about page, believes that “transparency creates a better society for all people”. Through publishing information openly this can be better realised. With the ability to jump around the web, accessing source material at the literal click of a button, the importance of transparency and its benefits to the public are evident. David Weinberger, Harvard Researcher, posted a strong argument as to why transparency is the new objectivity on his blog. He pointed out, “Objectivity is a trust mechanism you rely on when your medium can’t do links. Now our medium can”.


There appears to be growing support for transparency with the BBC’s Global News Director saying that, “transparency is what delivers trust”. Ultimately the news produced by journalists still has to be accurate and fair. This firm belief that objectivity alone no longer works as the overriding ethos for journalism lends weight to the belief that transparency is in fact the new objectivity.

Tuesday, 21 October 2014

News is in the palm of your hand.

09:09 Posted by Joshua Gresham No comments
I remember growing up as a child listening to the 6 o’clock news on television in my family home. I remember hearing about major international events with ‘breaking news bulletins’ flashing across the screen. How things have changed in the years that followed. With the ever-growing presence of technology in journalism the way we receive and send out news has changed. 6 o’clock bulletins still exist but who amongst us actually watches them as a source of new and fresh ‘news’? Social media and the web in general have offered a new way for the public to not only receive the news but also experience it. The timeliness of news delivery has risen in importance. Through the avenue of Twitter, as well as various other forms of social media, news is now a 24hour process, providing the audience with a real-time flow of information and news. That’s not to say traditional forms of news media are finished but the way in which ‘breaking news’ gets out is and has been evolving for some time.

I was recently shown the following video during a seminar run at the University of Newcastle. It sheds some light on Twitter and its impact on the world of journalism.




There is of course opposition to social media and its potentially harmonious relationship with journalism. With many believing that Twitter is in fact assisting the decline of journalism. The Australian in fact wrote an editorial about this very fact. In response to this Bronwen Cune wrote an opinion piece for The Guardian putting forth her belief that “platforms such as Twitter and Facebook are wonderful tools for journalists”.


Whether or not Twitter and social media in general is beneficial for journalism is certainly up for debate. Whilst these new and emerging platforms have their faults, with verification and the credibility of information often in question, it is my belief that they are powerful tools for journalists. It does however remain the responsibility of the journalist to effectively and accurately use social media so as to maximise its potential for the public. Maybe I’ll sit down and watch the 6 o’clock news tonight for old times sake.